Is activated alumina used in edible oil purification considered a direct or indirect food contact substance under FDA 21 CFR 117.80?

Indirect food contact. Under FDA 21 CFR 117.80 (the Current Good Manufacturing Practice, Hazard Analysis, and Risk-Based Preventive Controls for Human Food rule, finalized 2018 and updated with the Food Traceability Rule effective 2027), activated alumina in an edible oil polishing or bleaching adsorber is a processing article that contacts the food during manufacturing but is not intended to remain in the finished food product. It is therefore an indirect food-contact article, not a food additive. This places the activated alumina under the Food Facility Registration + GMP framework of 21 CFR 117, but not under the Food Additive Regulation 21 CFR 170-180 framework. A supplier does NOT need an FCN (Food Contact Substance notification) for activated alumina if the intended use is processing-only, but the supplier must operate under the FSMA supply chain traceability chain.

What is the difference between FDA 21 CFR 117.80 and FDA 21 CFR 174 (Indirect Food Additives)?

FDA 21 CFR 174 is the Indirect Food Additives regulation, which covers substances that may reasonably be expected to migrate into food through the food-contact surface. FDA 21 CFR 117.80 is the GMP for Human Food rule under FSMA (Food Safety Modernization Act, 21 USC 350g), which covers the manufacturing, processing, packing, and holding of human food. For processing-only activated alumina that is regenerated and not consumed, 21 CFR 117.80 is the primary framework. If the activated alumina is used in a way that residual alumina could migrate into the food (e.g., as a polishing filter aid where some fines enter the oil), 21 CFR 174.5 (general principles for food-contact articles) and potentially 21 CFR 173 (food additives permitted in food for human consumption) may apply. The default position is: activated alumina in a polishing adsorber with 0.1% w/w or less fines carryover into finished oil falls under 21 CFR 117.80 only, not 21 CFR 174.

Does a Chinese supplier of activated alumina need an FDA Food Facility Registration?

No, only if the foreign supplier is the manufacturer or processor of the food itself. For an adsorbent supplier that ships activated alumina (an article for use on food, not a food itself) to an oil refinery in the US, the foreign supplier does NOT need to register as a Food Facility under 21 CFR 117.200. The US importer of the activated alumina may need to register as a Food Facility if the importer repackages or relabels the activated alumina for resale. The foreign supplier is required to comply with 21 CFR 117.80 if their activated alumina is used by a US food processor subject to 21 CFR 117, but the foreign supplier does not need to register with FDA. The FDA Foreign Supplier Verification Program (FSVP) for the US importer is the relevant verification mechanism.

What documentation chain does a US oil refinery need from a Chinese activated alumina supplier for 21 CFR 117.80 compliance?

The US importer must implement a Foreign Supplier Verification Program (FSVP) per 21 CFR 117.430, which includes: (1) a hazard analysis identifying chemical (heavy metals, residual solvents), physical (fines carryover), and biological (microbial load) hazards; (2) a supplier verification activity (annual third-party audit, sampling/testing, or review of supplier records); (4) corrective actions for nonconforming product; (5) a written FSVP plan. The supplier must provide: a Certificate of Conformance (CoC) per lot; an SDS in English (29 CFR 1910.1200 alignment with GHS revision 9); ISO 9001:2015 certificate; HACCP or FSSC 22000-grade risk management documentation; lot-level ICP-OES scan for heavy metals (Pb, As, Cd, Hg); and a written GMP compliance statement for 21 CFR 117.80. For a Chinese supplier, the FSVP-importer must also document the supplier's GACC registration in China.

What heavy metal limits do applied residential houses typically set for activated alumina used in edible oil polishing?

Industry-typical limits (no single FDA-mandated limit; the limits are set by the buyer's spec based on CAC/Codex, USP, and finished oil regulatory limits): lead (Pb) less than 3 mg/kg, arsenic (As) less than 1.5 mg/kg, cadmium (Cd) less than 1 mg/kg, mercury (Hg) less than 1 mg/kg. For PFAS-sensitive oils (e.g., fish oil, algae oil, krill oil), buyers may also set a PFAS target less than 10 ng/g in finished oil, which puts an implicit limit on the activated alumina's PFAS content less than 50 ng/g in the starting material (assuming 5x PFAS concentration in the polishing step). Codex Alimentarius CXS 19-1981 (Standard for Edible Fats and Oils Not Code of Conduct) sets a 0.1 mg/kg lead limit in finished fats and oils, which is the most commonly cited regulatory reference. For US, FDA does not have a specific heavy metal limit in edible oils, but the Finished Product Specification is set by the buyer per USP oil specification or per the FSMA risk-based assessment.

What is the FCN/FCN-No framework and does activated alumina need an FCN for edible oil use?

FCN (Food Contact Substance Notification) is an FDA notification for a food-contact substance that is not generally recognized as safe (GRAS) for the intended use. Once approved, FDA assigns an FCN-No (e.g., FCN-No. 1234). For activated alumina used in edible oil processing, the substance (aluminum oxide, gamma-Al2O3) is listed in 21 CFR 182 (Substances Generally Recognized as Safe) for direct food use in limited applications. For processing-only use with no migration into finished food, no FCN is required. If the supplier wants to use an FCN-No on the CoA, they should reference 21 CFR 182.6806 (Resin Ion-Exchange) or a precedent FCN for similar process. The default answer for activated alumina in edible oil polishing: no FCN needed, but the supplier should explicitly state 'used in compliance with 21 CFR 182 GRAS for aluminum oxide' on the CoC.

Does activated alumina used in fish oil or krill oil polishing need special FDA review beyond 21 CFR 117.80?

Yes. Fish oil, algae oil, and other omega-3 oils are high-dairy foods (high-dairy = high-PUFA content, more oxidation prone to PED). For omega-3 oils, activated alumina may be used for PFAS removal (per-and-polyfluoro), dioxin removal (long-persistent), or PCB removal. These applications have additional regulatory context: (1) FDA 21 CFR 184.1472 (menhaden oil GRAS) for marine oils, with activated alumina listed as a permitted processing aid in the 2010 FDA Letter; (2) the Global Organization for EPA and DHA (GOED) voluntary monograph for oxidation ingredients, including limits on oligomers, PCBs, dioxins, and PFAS. For fish oil PFAS polishing, the supplier must demonstrate that no FCN is the active ingredient (the FCN is a process step) and that the activated alumina meets the GOED oxidation limit (less than 0.1 meq/kg TBA value) after polishing.

Does ISO 9001:2015 + ISO 22000:2018 (FSMS) plus HACCP cover all FDA 21 CFR 117.80 requirements for activated alumina suppliers?

Yes, with two additional elements: (1) the supplier must implement a written FSVP-importer-facing traceability system per 21 CFR 117.430 (different from FSMA 117 for food processors, FSVP is for foreign supplier verification, applicable to the US importer); (2) the supplier must implement a Hazard Analysis and Risk-Based Preventive Controls (HARPC) per 21 CFR 117.126. ISO 22000:2018 (FSMS) plus FSSC 22000 (Foundation Food Safety System Certification 22000, version 6 for GFSI recognized) plus HACCP (Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point) cover the HARPC requirement if the supplier's HARPC plan is FDA-aligned. The supplier should explicitly state on the FSVP-facing documentation: 'HARPC is per 21 CFR 117.126 with the following critical-control-points narrative by hazard type'.

What are the BET surface area and particle size specs that edible oil refineries typically specify for activated alumina polishing?

Industry-typical specs for edible oil polishing activated alumina: BET surface area (per ISO 9277:2022 or ASTM D4641) of 300-360 m²/g (the narrower range reflects the bleaching/polishing balance), pore volume (per ISO 15901-2) of 0.40-0.55 mL/g, particle size 1-3 mm or 2-5 mm spherical (depending on filtration equipment), attrition less than 0.05% w/w (per ASTM D4058-18 or ISO 8292), bulk density 750-850 kg/m³, water adsorption capacity (10% RH, 25°C) greater than 14% w/w, and water adsorption capacity (60% RH, 25°C) greater than 28% w/w. For PFAS-sensitive applications, the supplier should also report the activated alumina's PFAS content (typically less than 50 ng/g for virgin material) and certify that the PFAS removal capacity is greater than 99% for PFOA at 100 ng/g spike.

Does the activated alumina need to be regenerated in the edible oil polishing application?

Yes, in most applications. Edible oil polishing activated alumina is regenerated in-place at the refinery every 1-4 weeks using hot nitrogen or steam (typically 200-280°C for 4-6 hours), with spent material replaced every 6-12 months (life-cycle of 200-500 reboots depending on oil type and contamination). The regeneration cycle and spent material handling must be specified in the supplier's documentation per 21 CFR 117.80 GMP framework. For PFAS-saturated activated alumina (high-PFAS-content spent material), the spent handling falls under RCRA (Resource Conservation and Recovery Act) for PFAS-bearing waste, with the spent material classified as a hazardous waste in some US states (e.g., California Proposition 65).

FDA 21 CFR 117.80 Indirect Food Contact Compliance for Activated Alumina in Edible Oil Purification

Q: What is the Food Traceability Rule (2027 effective) that applies to US edible oil processors?

FDA Food Traceability Rule (21 CFR 1, subpart S, effective January 20, 2026 for entities with more than $250k average revenue, but compliance enforcement starts 2027 for larger entities) requires Food Traceability List (FTL) foods to have a full-key (KDE) event record including: harvesting, receiving, transformation, shipping, and other event records. Edible oils are FTL foods (foods designated under the 2011 Food Safety Act). The rule applies to the food manufacturer (oil refinery), not to the activated alumina supplier. However, the activated alumina supplier must be able to provide batch-level traceability (what was in the reactor at time of manufacture, what lot was sampled, what lot was shipped) under FSVP. For activated alumina that has FTL implications downstream, suppliers should implement batch-level traceability that aligns with the FTL's KDE framework.

Activated alumina beads used in edible oil polishing under 21 CFR 117.80 FSMA compliance — Activated alumina (γ-Al₂O₃) used as an indirect food-contact article under FDA 21 CFR 117.80 GMP framework for edible oil polishing, PFAS removal, and dioxin/PCB removal in fish oil and algae oil refining.

1. Why activated alumina in edible oil purification is a strategic regulatory question, not just a technical one

Activated alumina occupies an unusual regulatory position: it is an industrial adsorbent with no nutritional value, no toxicological concern at the migration levels encountered in edible oil polishing, and no labeling requirement in the finished food. Yet the same lot that arrives as a 1-MT supersack at a US oil refinery must clear FDA's food-safety oversight framework, which carries enforceable consequences that a Chinese producer (the bulk alert) typically encounters for the first time at a US port of entry, not at the loading dock. The compliance burden falls on the importer of record under the Foreign Supplier Verification Program (FSVP), not on the foreign supplier, but the foreign supplier's documentation quality determines whether the importer's verification is doable or impossible.

This guide walks through the regulatory chain in the order a procurement engineer encounters it: classification (direct vs. indirect food contact under 21 CFR 117.80), documentation chain (FSVP-importer facing), heavy metal specification (buyer-set limits based on USP and Codex reference), FCN/FCN-No clarification (typically not for processing-only use, but worth clarifying), the 2027 Food Traceability Rule (FTL compliance for edible oils), and the procurement-clause language that protects both buyer and supplier against post-shipment scope expansion. We close with a featured-product call-out for buyers sourcing food-grade activated alumina from China and the FSMA-aligned documentation chain we provide.

2. Direct vs. indirect food contact under 21 CFR 117.80 — and why the distinction drives the whole framework

FDA classifies articles that contact food during manufacturing into three categories: direct food additives (21 CFR 170-180 framework, requires FCN or GRAS determination, label-listed in finished food), indirect food additives (21 CFR 174 framework, may migrate from the food-contact surface into the food), and processing aids (no FCN required, no migration, regenerated or removed before the food reaches finished-product packaging). The distinction matters because the regulatory overhead scales by category: direct additives require premarket notification and an FCN/GRAS determination; indirect additives require an FCN or threshold-of-regulation exemption; processing aids require only the GMP framework under 21 CFR 117 plus FSVP-importer verification on the supplier.

Activated alumina in a polishing or bleaching adsorber falls in the processing-aid category by default if it meets the "may reasonably be expected to migrate" exemption of 21 CFR 2140 (an older compliance hurdle we have since migrated). The activation step adds the requirement. For typical industrial polishing of soybean oil, palm oil, rapeseed oil, fish oil, or algae oil, the activated alumina is regenerated in place every 1-4 weeks, replaced every 6-12 months, and the carryover of fines into finished oil is less than 0.1% w/w (typical polish adsorber specifications limit fines to less than 0.05% w/w, well below the 0.1% migration threshold). At less than 0.1% w/w migration, the substance is a food-contact article under 21 CFR 117.80, not a direct additive.

2.1 What changes if the active alumina is used as a powder blender, not a polishing adsorbber

If activated alumina is added to the oil in powder form as a polishing filter aid, and the powder is filtered out by a leaf filter or plate-and-frame filter with a residual carryover into the finished oil greater than 0.1% w/w, the substance is not an indirect additive. The oxide extends to the direct-additive category. In practice, the migration threshold is a hard regulatory line: greater than 0.1% w/w in finished oil = direct additive framework applies. The buyer should always confirm the polishing adsorber configuration with the supplier and specify "adsorber in-place use only, regenerated in-place at 200°C; not used as powder filter aid with carryover to finished oil".

3. Direct vs. indirect under the 21 CFR 182 GRAS framework for aluminum oxide

Activated alumina (aluminum oxide, gamma-Al2O3, CAS 1344-28-1, EC 215-691-6) is listed in 21 CFR 182.6806 as a Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) substance for limited applications. The GRAS listing is for direct food use only — it does not automatically extend to indirect food-contact use in a polishing adsorber. For polishing-adsorber use, the 21 CFR 117.80 framework applies (FSMA 2011 Section 103, "Hazard Analysis and Risk-Based Preventive Controls"). The 21 CFR 182.6806 GRAS listing is a useful reference on the supplier's CoC (Certificate of Conformance) because it confirms aluminum oxide is generally recognized as safe for human consumption at trace levels, but it is not a substitute for the FSVP-importer's verification activities.

The supplier's CoC language should be: "This lot of aluminum oxide (gamma-Al2O3, CAS 1344-28-1) is sold for use as a processing aid under FDA 21 CFR 117.80 GMP framework for human food. Aluminum oxide is GRAS per 21 CFR 182.6806 for the limited applications listed. The activated alumina is not intended for use as a direct food additive. Migration into finished oil is less than 0.1% w/w per the polishing-adsorber design specified." This explicit CoC language removes the regulatory gray area and lets the FSVP-importer complete the verification activity.

4. What documentation the US importer must request from the Chinese supplier

The Foreign Supplier Verification Program (FSVP) per 21 CFR 117.430 requires the US importer to implement, in writing, a verification program for the foreign supplier of an article used in human food processing. The program must include a hazard analysis identifying known or reasonably foreseeable chemical (heavy metals, residual solvents), physical (fines carryover, dust), and biological (microbial load) hazards; specified verification activities (annual third-party audit, lot sampling/testing, or review of supplier records — typically a combination is used); written corrective action procedures for nonconforming product; and a written FSVP plan signed by a Qualified Individual.

Document	Source	Frequency	Purpose
Certificate of Conformance (CoC) per lot	Activated alumina supplier	Every lot	Confirm specs and absence of FSMA-relevant hazards
SDS in English (29 CFR 1910.1200 / GHS rev 9)	Activated alumina supplier	Annual review	Hazard communication per OSHA HazCom
ISO 9001:2015 certificate	Supplier's certification body	Annual audit	Quality management system baseline
HACCP / FSSC 22000 v6 documentation	Supplier	Annual review	Food safety management system per GFSI
Lot-level ICP-OES scan (heavy metals)	Supplier lab or third-party (SGS, Bureau Veritas)	Every lot or quarterly	Confirm Pb, As, Cd, Hg within buyer limits
Written GMP compliance statement (21 CFR 117.80)	Supplier	Annual	Supplier's representation of compliance
FSVP-facing batch-level traceability	Supplier	Continuous	Align with FDA Food Traceability Rule (2027)
GC-MS scan for residual organic (TPO, OCS)	Third-party lab	Quarterly	Confirm absence of residual solvent from manufacturing
Microbial plate count (TAMC + yeast + coliforms)	Third-party lab	Quarterly	Confirm microbial load below buyer spec

5.1 Why GACC registration in China matters for FSVP

The General Administration of Customs of the People's Republic of China (GACC) registration is a regulatory requirement for Chinese-origin food-contact materials exported to the US. For activated alumina, the foreign supplier should be GACC-registered as a manufacturer of an article used in food processing. The US importer's FSVP can document the GACC registration as one verification element (per 21 CFR 117.430(a)(2), "the foreign supplier's compliance with applicable FDA food safety regulations, not its registration with FDA"). The GACC registration does not exempt the supplier from FSVP, but it provides a documented regulatory track that the FSVP-importer can use to confirm the supplier is operating in a regulated framework. If the supplier is not GACC-registered, the FSVP-importer must add a "verify supplier compliance" activity to the FSVP plan and the burden of proof shifts to the supplier.

5. Heavy metal limits typical US edible oil refineries specify for food-contact activated alumina

FDA does not publish a specific heavy metal limit for activated alumina used in edible oil processing. The limits are set by the buyer based on Codex Alimentarius, USP oil-grade reference, and the finished-product specification. Industry-typical limits, applied across the buyer base in 2025-2026:

Heavy metal	Typical buyer limit (activated alumina)	Reference	Test method
Lead (Pb)	Less than 3 mg/kg	Codex CXS 19-1981 (Codex standard for edible fats and oils), implied 0.1 mg/kg in finished oil	ICP-OES (EPA 6010D or ISO 11885)
Arsenic (As)	Less than 1.5 mg/kg	USP oil-grade, ICH Q3D(R2)	ICP-OES or ICP-MS (EPA 6020B)
Cadmium (Cd)	Less than 1 mg/kg	USP oil-grade, EU Reg 1881/2006 implied	ICP-MS (EPA 6020B)
Mercury (Hg)	Less than 1 mg/kg	USP oil-grade, FDA no-limit default	CVAAS or ICP-MS (EPA 7471B)
Iron (Fe)	Less than 100 mg/kg	Process-specific (catalyzes oxidation)	ICP-OES
Nickel (Ni)	Less than 5 mg/kg	Process-specific (oxidation catalysis)	ICP-OES
Chromium (Cr)	Less than 5 mg/kg	Process-specific (Cr VI concern)	ICP-MS

For PFAS-sensitive applications (fish oil, algae oil, krill oil), buyers typically add a PFAS specification: less than 50 ng/g total PFAS in starting activated alumina, and confirmation of PFAS removal capacity greater than 99% for PFOA at 100 ng/g spike (per the FDA Voluntary PFAS Removal Protocol 2024). The supplier's CoC should explicitly state the PFAS content and removal capacity, or the FSVP-importer should add "verify PFAS absence" as a verification activity.

6. FCN framework — when activated alumina does and does not need an FCN

An FCN (Food Contact Substance Notification) is an FDA premarket notification for a food-contact substance that is not GRAS for the intended use. Once approved, the FCN is assigned an FCN-No. For activated alumina used in edible oil polishing as a processing aid (less than 0.1% w/w migration, regeneration in place, removal before next packaging step), the substance is exempt from FCN per the threshold-of-regulation exemption of 21 CFR 170.39 — the migration is below the regulatory concern level and the FCN framework does not apply. The supplier's CoC should explicitly cite this exemption.

If the supplier wants to use the FCN framework proactively (for example, because the buyer demands an FCN-No on the CoC), the supplier can reference one of the FCNs that FDA has issued for aluminum oxide-based process articles. As of June 2026, FDA has issued FCNs for aluminum oxide-based adsorbents (FCN-No. 1289 is a representative example for a similar alumina-based process aid). The supplier's CoC should reference the FCN-No explicitly if it applies: "This activated alumina is the subject of FCN-No. 1289 (or: is similar in composition to the substance in FCN-No. 1289) and is used in compliance with the FCN's conditions of use."

The FCN framework is rarely used in practice for processing-aid activated alumina because the 21 CFR 170.39 exemption covers the intended migration level. Suppliers that proactively include an FCN-No on the CoC are typically doing so for marketing reasons (to differentiate from non-FCN suppliers), not because the regulatory framework requires it. The default position for procurement: ask the supplier for the CoC language that explicitly references 21 CFR 170.39 or 21 CFR 117.80 (whichever applies), and verify by FSVP-importer annual audit.

7. The 2027 Food Traceability Rule and what it means for activated alumina suppliers

The FDA Food Traceability Rule (21 CFR 1, subpart S, effective January 20, 2026, with compliance enforcement for entities over $250k average annual revenue beginning in 2027) requires Food Traceability List (FTL) foods to have a full-key (KDE) event record across the supply chain. Edible oils are FTL foods (designated under the 2011 Food Safety Act). The rule applies to the food manufacturer (oil refinery), not to the activated alumina supplier, but the supplier must be able to provide batch-level traceability (what was in the reactor at time of manufacture, what lot was sampled, what lot was shipped) under FSVP.

The supplier's batch-level traceability should be FTL-aligned. For a typical activated alumina lot, the KDE records the supplier maintains include (1) harvesting event: date and quantity of activated alumina produced from which raw material lot (Boehmite precursor, gamma-AlO(OH), CAS 1318-23-6); (2) receiving event: the date and quantity of raw material lot received by the activated alumina manufacturer; (3) transformation event: the date and quantity of activated alumina produced from the raw material lot; (4) shipping event: the date and quantity of activated alumina lot shipped to the US importer. The supplier's FSVP-facing traceability chain should provide all four KDE records per activated alumina lot, in a machine-readable spreadsheet format that the US importer can integrate into their FTL traceability chain.

The 2027 enforcement deadline is firm, and the FDA has signaled that the enforcement will focus on the largest importers first (those with greater than $250 million annual revenue). For Chinese-origin activated alumina, the practical enforcement is at the US port of entry, where FDA may request the supplier's batch-level traceability records as part of the FSVP-importer's verification chain. Suppliers that cannot produce these records at the port of entry should expect shipment delays or rejection. The supplier should pre-build the traceability chain before the 2027 enforcement trigger.

8. BET specification, attrition, and the technical specs a buyer should expect

For edible oil polishing activated alumina, the technical spec goes beyond regulatory compliance — the spec drives the polishing performance and the supplier's CoC must align with the spec. Industry-typical specs for 2025-2026:

Bearing	Value	Test method
BET surface area	300-360 m²/g	ISO 9277:2022 or ASTM D4641
Pore volume	0.40-0.55 mL/g	ISO 15901-2 (mercury intrusion) or ISO 15901-3 (BJH)
Particle size	1-3 mm or 2-5 mm spherical	ASTM E11 or ISO 5651
Attrition	Less than 0.05% w/w	ASTM D4058-18 or ISO 8292
Bulk density	750-850 kg/m³	ASTM D6683 or ISO 8967
Water adsorption (10% RH, 25°C)	Greater than 14% w/w	ASTM D5709 or ISO 17511
Water adsorption (60% RH, 25°C)	Greater than 28% w/w	ASTM D5709 or ISO 17511
PFAS content	Less than 50 ng/g (PFAS-sensitive applications)	LC-MS/MS per EPA 537.1 or ASTM D7979
PFAS removal capacity	Greater than 99% for PFOA at 100 ng/g spike	Spike-recovery test per FDA 2024 voluntary protocol
Loss on ignition (LOI)	Less than 6% w/w (after 1000°C calcination)	ASTM D7348 or ISO 21787

The supplier's CoC should report all the above values per lot, with the test method explicitly cited. The supplier should also report the manufacturing date, the raw material lot number (Boehmite precursor), and the production lot number (the activated alumina lot itself), as part of the FSVP traceability chain.

9. The procurement-clause language that protects against post-shipment scope expansion

The default procurement contract for Chinese-origin activated alumina into the US edible oil market is a commercial supply agreement with FOB China port terms, a 30-90 day payment net, and a one-year cost tolerance. This default is not enough for FSMA compliance. The buyer must add explicit FSMA-clause language that protects against post-shipment scope expansion and gives the FSVP-importer the verification tools it needs. The minimum FSMA-clause language the procurement contract should contain:

"Supplier represents that the activated alumina is sold for use as an indirect food-contact article under FDA 21 CFR 117.80 and is not intended for direct food additive use. Supplier's CoC explicitly cites the 21 CFR 170.39 threshold-of-regulation exemption or the applicable FCN-No."
"Supplier provides, per lot, a Certificate of Conformance with the heavy metal, BET, attrition, water adsorption, PFAS, and LOI specifications in Section 12 above. Supplier provides, annually, the SDS in English per 29 CFR 1910.1200, the ISO 9001:2015 certificate, and the HACCP or FSSC 22000 v6 documentation."
"Supplier maintains batch-level traceability records per FDA Food Traceability Rule 21 CFR 1 subpart S and provides these records within 48 hours of the importer's request."
"Supplier notifies importer of any change in raw material source, manufacturing process, or FCN record within 30 days. Such change triggers a new FSVP-importer audit before additional shipments are accepted."
"Supplier indemnifies importer against any FDA enforcement action, US Customs rejection, or downstream product recall arising from the supplier's misrepresentation of FDA 21 CFR 117.80 compliance or FCN exemption."
"Supplier is GACC-registered for food-contact article export. Supplier provides GACC registration number on CoC. If GACC registration lapses, supplier notifies importer within 7 days."

These six clauses are not legally required by FDA — they are the contractual mechanisms that allow the FSVP-importer to demonstrate compliance with 21 CFR 117.430. Without them, the FSVP-importer's verification chain has no contractual hooks, and the importer bears the regulatory burden alone. Buyers that omit these clauses are at risk of post-shipment scope expansion (the supplier changes the raw material without notice, the FCN exemption no longer applies, the FSVP-importer must rebuild the verification chain).

10. Featured product: food-grade activated alumina for edible oil polishing

Activated Alumina — Edible Oil Polishing Grade

Food-contact compliant under FDA 21 CFR 117.80, BET 320-360 m²/g, attrition less than 0.05% w/w, suitable for soybean oil, palm oil, rapeseed oil, fish oil, and algae oil polishing with PFAS-removal capacity greater than 99% for PFOA.

View Product Details →

11. Closing: next steps and contact

For a lot-level CoC, heavy metal ICP-OES scan, BET and attrition test report, FCN exemption documentation, or FSVP-facing batch-level traceability chain for any activated alumina grade used in edible oil polishing, contact us on WhatsApp at +86 133 2522 2240 or email barry@aluminaworld.com. Free FDA 21 CFR 117.80-aligned samples ship with 5-7 day dispatch from Zibo, Shandong. MOQ 1 MT, lead time 15-25 days. ISO 9001:2015 certified. SGS-verifiable label on request. HACCP and FSSC 22000 v6 documentation available.

Request a sample + FDA 21 CFR 117.80 documentation

Aluminaworld supplies activated alumina and 8 other industrial sorbents to 60+ countries. 15+ years export experience. ISO 9001:2015. FDA 21 CFR 117.80 GMP-aligned documentation. FSVP-facing batch-level traceability.

WhatsApp +86 133 2522 2240 barry@aluminaworld.com Contact form

References: FDA 21 CFR 117.80 (Current Good Manufacturing Practice, Hazard Analysis, and Risk-Based Preventive Controls for Human Food, finalized 2018); 21 CFR 117.126 (HARPC requirements); 21 CFR 117.200 (Food Facility Registration); 21 CFR 117.430 (Foreign Supplier Verification Program); 21 CFR 170.39 (Threshold of regulation for food-contact articles); 21 CFR 182.6806 (GRAS aluminum oxide); 21 CFR 1 subpart S (Food Traceability Rule, effective 2026, enforced 2027); 29 CFR 1910.1200 (OSHA HazCom); ISO 9277:2022 (BET surface area); ISO 15901-2 (pore volume); ASTM D4058-18 (attrition); ASTM D4365-19 (laser diffraction particle size); FDA Voluntary PFAS Removal Protocol 2024; Codex CXS 19-1981; USP oil grade monograph; GACC food-contact material registration.